Se: Anor | Noteringar
1 Brian Percy Hugh Scutt, född omkring februari 1937, Bournemouth, Hampshire. Föräldrar: 2 och 3. Gift omkring november 1962, Scarborough district, Yorkshire, med Margaret Geller. [Notering 1].
2 Thomas Percy Hugh Scutt, född omkring januari 1896, Chard, Somerset, döpt den 16 januari 1896, Chard, Charlton-Mackrell, Somerset, död i augusti 1988, Bournemouth, Dorset (livslängd: kanske 92 år). Föräldrar: 4 och 5. [Notering 2].
... gift omkring november 1931, Bournemouth, Hampshire, med...
3 Mildred Irene Lee, född den 30 april 1905, Pontypridd district, Wales, död i januari 1993, Bournemouth, Dorset (livslängd: 87 år). [Notering 3].
... barn:
4 Thomas Scutt, född omkring 1851, Preston, Dorset, död den 5 februari 1902, Chard, Somerset, begravd, Chard Cemetery (livslängd: kanske 51 år) (erkännande far: Robert Scutt 1797-1878). [Notering 4].
... gift den 30 april 1885, Symondsbury, Dorset, med...
5 Sarah Louisa Hecks, född omkring november 1859, Wincham, Somerset, död den 13 april 1942, Bournemouth, Hampshire, begravd i april 1942, Chard, Somerset (livslängd: kanske 82 år). [Notering 5].
... barn:
| BM(Deaths) states Percy Thomas Scutt b:1894 Nov 11. |
| T S 51yr., farmer and miller, living at Hornsbury. To Mary Ann Scutt (widow) & Isabella Scutt (spinster). |
| [Exeter & Plymouth Gazette, Devon, Friday 01 June 1906. Alleged Diversion of a Stream. A Chard Case. At the Chard County Court, before his Honour Judge Beresford, Mrs. Louisa Scutt, Hornsbury Mills, Chard, sued Obadiah Shower, farmer, of Eleigh Water Farm, Chard, for damages for the alleged diversion of a stream water, and applied for injunction restraining defendant from continuing the diversion. Mr W Booker, Wellington, appeared for plaintiff, and Mr. C F Saunders, Crewkerne, for defendant. Mr. Saunders said he thought before his Honour went into the evidence ought first to view the locus quo. Moreover, he (Mr. Saunders) only received his instructions few days before, and had not been allowed sufficient time to prepare his case. His Honour pointed out that that was the fault of Mr. Saunders's client, who kept the summons in his pocket for nearly a fortnight. He could only adjourn the case on defendant agreeing to pay the costs. Mr. Saunders said that would be imposing heavy penalty on his client, as the witnesses for the other side were numerous, and some had come a considerable distance. Rather than incur that loss, he was prepared to go on with the case. His Honour, however, ultimately decided to adjourn the case and reserve the question of costs, the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, who were the owners of the property, had received no intimation of the unless they were represented, the case might have be re-opened. In the meantime he would view the scene of the dispute.] [S L S 82yr.] |
| E C 90yr. |