Skip navigation menu

Sarah Louisa Hecks ca 1859-1942

attēli
Sarah Louisa/Louisa/Sarah
Hecks/Scutt
iespējams 82 gadi
  • Dzimšanas ap 1859 novembris - Wincham, Somerset
  • Miršanas datums: 1942.gada 13.aprīlis - Bournemouth, Hampshire
  • Apbedīts mēnesī 1942 aprīlis - Chard, Somerset

Ģimene un bērni

  • Precību datums: 1885.gada 30.aprīlis, Symondsbury, Dorset, precējusies ar Thomas Scutt ca 1851-1902 (iespējams 51 gadi)
    attēli
    dēls ->
    /


    \
     
    ------
    Hatton

    attēli māte
    Susan
    Hatton
    1815-1883
    68 gadi
    bērni: [n (number)] bērni:
     
    Ethel Rose
    1887-1978
     90 gadi
     
    Hilda Louise
    ca 1890-
     
     
    Thomas Percy Hugh
    ca 1896-1988
     iespējams 92 gadi

[individual notes]

[Exeter & Plymouth Gazette, Devon, Friday 01 June 1906. Alleged Diversion of a Stream. A Chard Case. At the Chard County Court, before his Honour Judge Beresford, Mrs. Louisa Scutt, Hornsbury Mills, Chard, sued Obadiah Shower, farmer, of Eleigh Water Farm, Chard, for damages for the alleged diversion of a stream water, and applied for injunction restraining defendant from continuing the diversion. Mr W Booker, Wellington, appeared for plaintiff, and Mr. C F Saunders, Crewkerne, for defendant. Mr. Saunders said he thought before his Honour went into the evidence ought first to view the locus quo. Moreover, he (Mr. Saunders) only received his instructions few days before, and had not been allowed sufficient time to prepare his case. His Honour pointed out that that was the fault of Mr. Saunders's client, who kept the summons in his pocket for nearly a fortnight. He could only adjourn the case on defendant agreeing to pay the costs. Mr. Saunders said that would be imposing heavy penalty on his client, as the witnesses for the other side were numerous, and some had come a considerable distance. Rather than incur that loss, he was prepared to go on with the case. His Honour, however, ultimately decided to adjourn the case and reserve the question of costs, the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, who were the owners of the property, had received no intimation of the unless they were represented, the case might have be re-opened. In the meantime he would view the scene of the dispute.] [S L S 82yr.]

Avoti (pirmsākums?)

  • Dzimšana: Chard 5c 303 / Census 1891-1901 Somerset.
  • Ģimene: Bridport 5a 730 / Census 1891-1901 Somerset.
  • Nāve: Bournemouth 2b 1226.